Free Beta

See exactly what happens
when you apply.

Paste your resume and a job posting. We'll show you which filters you clear, which will block you, and what — if anything — you can do about it before you apply.

Fortune · Today
AI generated identical résumés for a man and a woman: Hers was more likely to be labeled “weak,” while his got a 97% approval rating
Your Resume
— or paste below —
Job Description
— or paste below —
Load a demo scenario
The bias is documented. The filters are real.
What the research shows about who gets screened out — and why.
Race
85.1% of the time AI resume tools favor white-associated names Brookings Institution, 2024
50% fewer callbacks for Black-sounding names on identical resumes Bertrand & Mullainathan, Harvard/NBER
2.5× more callbacks when Black candidates remove racial identifiers from their resume University of Toronto, Whitening Study
Gender
51.9% of AI screening decisions favor men’s names — women’s favored only 11.1% of the time Brookings Institution, 2024
97% approval rate for an AI-generated man’s résumé — the identical woman’s was labeled “weak” Fortune, May 2026
50% of companies auto-flag gaps over 6 months — caregiving gaps fall disproportionately on women Harvard Business School Hidden Workers Study
Age
64% of workers 50+ have experienced or witnessed age discrimination in hiring AARP / EEOC Data
20,000+ age discrimination charges filed with the EEOC every year EEOC Annual Report
$3.9M in EEOC settlements against AI hiring tools for age discrimination in 2023–2024 alone iTutorGroup $365K + Accenture $3.5M
Irrelevant Past
27M Americans excluded from hiring by ATS filters for criteria unrelated to job performance Harvard Business School Hidden Workers Study
88% of employers reject qualified candidates who don’t exactly match keyword criteria Harvard Business School / Accenture
1.1B job applications rejected by Workday’s ATS — now subject to class action Mobley v. Workday, class certified May 2025
Mapping what will happen when you apply...
Barrier Level for Your Profile
For Employers — MeritPath
Give every applicant an answer. Not silence.
Most applicants never hear back. MeritPath lets you return instant, honest feedback on every application — what matched, what didn’t, what they could fix. Candidates respect it. Your brand benefits. And every decision is documented if you ever need it.
See Live Demo → Get the Assessment →
For Employers — MeritPath
Be the company that
actually tells people why.
Every applicant deserves to know where they stood. MeritPath sits above your existing ATS and sends every candidate an instant, honest breakdown — what they matched, what didn't fit, what they could address. No more ghosting. No more silence. Candidates remember the companies that treated them like people, and every decision is documented if you ever need it.
Candidate ATS MeritPath
Sarah Chen — 8 years engineering, career gap Rejected. Score: 61. Gaps isolated. Technical record verified. APPROVED.
Patricia Nguyen — 30 years customer success, graduated 1989 Rejected. Score: 57. Age proxy flagged. Retention record verified. APPROVED.
Derek Mobley — exceeds every requirement, 100+ rejections Rejected. Score: 63. Merit/score mismatch documented. Disparate impact flagged. APPROVED.